poltarchitecture.blogg.se

1. #Cyberpunk 2077 pc benchmark test 1080p#
2. #Cyberpunk 2077 pc benchmark test full#
3. #Cyberpunk 2077 pc benchmark test Pc#

#Cyberpunk 2077 pc benchmark test 1080p#

At these lower clock rates even greater differences in 1080p Average FPS and 2160p Frametime variances can then be expected.

#Cyberpunk 2077 pc benchmark test Pc#

Now you still have to keep in mind that DDR4-3200 CL16 is definitely not slow RAM either, and a large part of Cyberpunk gamers on PC are probably running at even lower XMP settings or even JEDEC clock rates. 22.8% is the difference in 1080p Average FPS between the fastest and slowest configuration tested, which is practically the same as the difference between an RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 3090. However, as our test today has shown, you still should not disregard the working memory. Especially at higher resolutions and graphics settings, the GPU bottleneck becomes noticeable, slowing down the entire render pipeline no matter how much data the CPU can deliver. Of course, to gamble in and around Night City, you’ll need a big CPU and an even bigger GPU. The single-ranked configs, whether with Intel or AMD line up behind it. So while due to high bandwidth we benefit from more Average FPS in 1080p, we see an advantage in frame time variances in 4K.

#Cyberpunk 2077 pc benchmark test full#

Doesn’t that sound familiar? Yes it does, because that’s exactly how the Average FPS ranking looked in Full HD. In the frame time variances, the dual-rank configs are now at the top together with the asynchronous DDR4-4400 config. Only the two dual-rank configurations and the asynchronous DDR4-4400 configuration, both with the 5950X, stand out positively in the 1% low FPS. Behind that, the results largely blur in run to run tolerance. Only the three dual-rank configs of the 10900K can measurably and repeatably stand out at the top.

In UHD, we are now almost completely bottlenecked by the GPU. Only the 5950X with single-rank DDR4-3200, which is also theoretically the slowest config, is at a clear disadvantage in the frame time variances and comes in last place. The rest follows with similarly constant frame times. In terms of frame time variances, only the two Intel configs with DDR4-4400 can really stand out. The last five places are occupied by the remaining AMD single-rank configurations. In the AMD results, DDR4-4400 with asynchronous IF comes out on top again, followed closely by the dual-rank configs. Intel clearly tops this chart, with all dual-rank ahead of single-rank configs. The only constants: The Intel system with DDR4-4400 is again the leader and the AMD system with asynchronous DDR4-3800 is the taillight.Īt 1440p we are increasingly GPU limited, but can still see differences greater than the 2% run to run variance.

We cannot detect other patterns also because of run to run variances. Higher bandwidths and dual-rank configs tend to be found higher up, lower bandwidths and single-rank configs lower down. When it comes to frame time variances in 1080p, the rankings are a bit more mixed. So RAM configuration makes a noticeable difference at 1080p Ultra Raytracing and comparable settings. On the Intel system, the largest measured gap is 13.2 FPS, which is 13.8%. That equates to 17.7% and about 14.6% difference respectively with identical CPU and GPU just by changing the RAM configuration. The measured difference between the fastest and slowest config with the Ryzen 5950X in average FPS are a whopping 15.9 FPS, and 13.1 FPS when excluding asynchronous configs. So the latency disadvantage compared to the synchronous DDR4-3800 does make itself noticeable in 1080p in the form of about 6% in AvgFPS and about 9% in 1%-Low FPS, resulting in last place. In addition to DDR4-4400, we also tested DDR4-3800 in 1:2 mode for verification. Cyberpunk 2077 in 1080p really lives on bandwidth! This is followed by the rest of the configurations with the 10900K and then the rest from AMD. Surprisingly, the fastest single-rank config is DDR4-4400 with the 5950X and asynchronous ratio of Infinity Fabric and RAM, despite the large latency disadvantage that comes with it. With a run-to-run variance of our benchmark of about 2%, however, one can speak of a tie here. Still, the 10900K is consistently faster, with DDR4-4400 marginally ahead of DDR4-3800.

As mentioned earlier, on the 5950X in dual-rank we were only able to use Geardown Mode, which should give it a latency advantage over 2T. Let’s start with Full HD or 1080p: Here Cyberpunk wants one thing above all else, bandwidth! All five dual-rank configurations can be found at the top, with the 10900K ahead of the 5950X.